No One Accused You, Charlie… So Why Are You Screaming ‘Not Guilty’?
“I’ve already accepted the fact…that..one day this activism thing might be the end of my life…it might cost me my life…I’m at peace with that. For me…this isn’t just a game…this is do or die"
Note to readers:
The following is a satirical and opinion-based commentary. It should not be interpreted as a factual claim about anyone’s guilt or involvement in criminal acts.
“Every worker in this supply chain is complicit…We will decide your fate, as you have decided the fate of millions…we have been closely watching you. We have your addresses…Death to Israel! Death to Australia! Death to America!”
These were the words spoken in a video by a masked individual claiming to be part of a group that took responsibility for the July 2025 arson attack on Melbourne-based company Lovitt Technologies. The video was published online on 14 July 2025.
Not long after the video surfaced, a far-left agitator — who goes by the moniker “Charlie the Commie” — took to Instagram to release a statement:
“I was not involved with any part of the Greensborough Direct Action At the Lovitt Technologies site.”
Interesting. No one publicly accused Charlie of being involved in the attack. So why the sudden need to clarify?
“I am not interested in playing the game of condemning resistance…”
Again — no one asked. If Charlie had nothing to do with the arson, why feel the need to declare whether or not he condemns it?
I first came across Charlie back in December 2024 after he uploaded the following video to his TikTok account:
In the video he states, “I’ve already accepted the fact…that..one day this activism thing might be the end of my life…it might cost me my life…I’m at peace with that. For me…this isn’t just a game…this is a do or die situation.”
A do-or-die situation? Cost him his life? In the age of Aaron Bushnell (who set himself on fire outside the Israeli embassy in Washington D.C.), Mohamed Sabry Soliman, and Elias Rodriguez (who both carried out killings in the name of “Palestine”), it’s worth asking — is this rhetoric just noise?
Charlie is highly active on TikTok and Instagram, where he regularly posts videos discussing so-called “direct actions” for “Palestine” across Melbourne.
Judging by his videos, Charlie is clearly a modest, low-profile type — you know, the kind of guy who hates being the centre of attention.
He’s articulate, confident, and has a distinctive radio broadcaster’s voice. He’s the type of guy who could sell ice to Eskimos, talk birds out of trees, or maybe even start a cult.
Over the last few weeks, Charlie has spent a considerable amount of time on his Instagram and TikTok accounts ranting incessantly about the events of 4 July 2025 where Lovitt technologies was targeted by arsonists, Israeli Miznon restaurant was attacked by a group of radical agitators and the East Melbourne Synagogue was firebombed.
Interestingly Charlie’s talking points about the events on that night mimic that of another agitator by the name of Mohammed Sharab. It’s as if these agitators are all reading from the same marketing script.
Both Charlie and Sharab have insisted (without a shred of actual evidence) that the firebombing of the synagogue — which occurred just 15 minutes after the attack on Miznon — had absolutely nothing to do with the “Free Palestine” movement.
Because, of course, it would be outrageous to even suggest that a movement where members have posted videos titled “Gas Kikes,” shouted “Go back to Germany, go back to Poland,” and tossed coins at Jews in Melbourne’s CBD — could have any issue with antisemitism. That would be an unfair generalisation. Just ask Charlie — he’s been very clear: nothing to see here. Source: “Trust me bro.”
For the record, I’m not saying Charlie had anything to do with any of the three events of Friday July 4 (including the arson attack against Lovitt technologies). There is no evidence to indicate that he was involved.